When Reality Expands: Spiritual Experiences and the Work of Integration
Sometimes people have experiences that don’t fit neatly into language or explanation. This piece explores how spiritual or non-ordinary experiences can be understood without being dismissed or overinterpreted, and why integration, rather than certainty, is often what matters most.

Sometimes people have experiences that cannot be fully captured in words. These experiences are mystical or spiritual in nature, and in a culture that prioritizes rational explanation and empirical certainty, they are often explained away, both by ourselves and by those we turn to for understanding. In my clinical work, I have encountered many people who report having such experiences at different points in their lives. Some describe brief moments of feeling connected to something larger than themselves. Others speak of encounters that felt deeply personal, such as sensing the presence of a loved one who has passed or a series of events that could not be easily explained by coincidence alone. And then there are those who describe more destabilizing experiences, including the temporary dissolution of the physical reality they once took for granted.
Such experiences exist on a continuum. What people experience and how they experience it can vary widely, and they occur in vastly differing contexts. Some happen during meditation, prayer or other practices, some during near-death experiences (Greyson, 2003), some during a psychedelic journey, and many others occur spontaneously, right in the middle of ordinary life. How people respond to these experiences can be equally varied. In my clinical work, most people I have spoken to kept their experiences to themselves out of fear of being judged or labeled “crazy.” They filed these experiences away in a deep corner of their minds, among things they felt they could never understand. Others explained them away, citing neurobiology and the tricks the mind can play. However, there were also those for whom the experiences were so profound that they shook the very foundation on which their life was built.
As human beings, we tend to organize our experiences into clear categories in order to make sense of them. Yet by their very nature, these experiences resist that. They challenge our assumptions about reality and confront us with our ignorance about our own existence. Alan Watts, in his lecture series The Nature of Consciousness (recorded 1960, released 2004), described how many people hold a mechanical view of the world, where the universe is understood as a system without inherent meaning. That view can offer a sense of stability. But when an experience disrupts it, the loss of certainty can feel unsettling. We do not know why we are here. We do not know what happens after death. And we may never know. To sit with these questions is to surrender the false comfort that certainty provides, which can be terrifying.
Yet for some people, these experiences are too significant to set aside. Whether it is a near-death experience, another spiritually transformative experience, or events that resist explanation, they feel compelled to seek understanding. They reach out to process what happened, find language for it, and integrate it into their lives. This takes courage. Too often, what they encounter instead is a clinical framework that cannot meet them there. These experiences are frequently pathologized or labeled as psychosis without sufficient differentiation. Some clinicians have described similar presentations as “spiritual emergence” or “spiritual emergency,” emphasizing the need to distinguish them from primary psychotic disorders (Grof & Grof, 1989; Lukoff, 1985). While true psychosis requires appropriate treatment, there is also a long cross-cultural history of viewing altered and mystical states as meaningful psychological experiences (El-Chakieh, 2025). The distinction is not always simple, and discernment is essential in how these experiences are understood and responded to. Not every non-ordinary experience is spiritual in nature, and careful assessment remains essential. But collapsing every non-ordinary experience into illness can add shame and confusion to an already vulnerable process.
Such experiences have tremendous potential to change one’s life in a meaningful way, and yet the process itself can be profoundly destabilizing. What I have learned, both personally and professionally, is that contrary to popular belief, spiritual work is neither an escape from being human nor a quick pass to enlightenment and bliss. It is a deeper encounter with our humanity. I know this not only from sitting with others in that process, but from having lived it myself. The process of bringing together who we were before these experiences and who we are becoming after them, reconciling our former understanding of reality with a more expansive and often uncertain one, and learning to hold all of this without losing ourselves is the work of integration.

Integration after a spiritual encounter is often non-linear and demanding. As people progress on this journey, misalignments between their way of life and their values become clearer. They are asked to travel to the deepest parts of their inner world and sit with their grief, trauma, and shame. Life offers many ways to distract from this kind of reckoning, and the choice to keep returning to this work remains theirs to make. Integration also requires humility. Interpretations of these experiences are always shaped by culture, history, and psychology, and rather than rushing toward a fixed meaning, the process invites people to stay open, to resist the pull toward premature certainty, and to trust that sitting with what is not yet understood is itself part of the work. When approached with openness and intention, this work has the capacity to break people open in ways they did not think possible. It can help them become fuller, more whole versions of themselves: people who carry the capacity to feel deeply and be moved by the world while staying grounded in themselves and in the awe of the vast uncertainty.
At the same time, many people do not have spaces where this kind of exploration is possible. Instead, they are often told they are ill and need to be medicated. Those closest to them may not understand what they are going through, or may quietly worry about their sanity. They find themselves unable to speak about what happened, even among people who otherwise consider themselves spiritual or religious. The result is a profound sense of isolation. When these experiences are met with dismissal or alarm rather than curiosity, it brings an enormous amount of shame, self-doubt, and loneliness to a process that is already deeply complex in its unfolding. In the absence of real support, many people turn to whatever is available, including tools like AI. These tools can offer information and a sense of being heard, but they cannot provide the relational grounding that this kind of process requires. In vulnerable moments, they can just as easily introduce ideas that destabilize rather than support integration. What this process asks for is space, presence, and patience, not quick answers or false certainty about what these experiences mean.
Spiritual experiences are neither proof of superiority nor pathology. They are invitations to remember who we are, and when approached with humility, curiosity, and intention, they can be catalysts for deep inner transformation. These experiences require a space where they can be explored without assumption, where questions are taken seriously, and where both psychological grounding and existential openness can develop together. A space that does not force a choice between skepticism and belief, but allows for careful, ongoing understanding.
References
El-Chakieh, S. (2025). Psychosis or Spiritual Experience? Rethinking Mental States Through Cultural and Mystical Lenses. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 39(3).
Greyson, B. (2003). Near-death experiences in a psychiatric outpatient clinic population. Psychiatric Services, 54(12), 1649–1651. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.54.12.1649
Grof, S., & Grof, C. (1989). Spiritual emergency: When personal transformation becomes a crisis. Los Angeles, CA: Tarcher.
Lukoff, D. (1985). The diagnosis of mystical experiences with psychotic features. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 17(2), 155–181.
Watts, A. W. (1960/2004). The nature of consciousness. On Out of your mind: Essential listening from the Alan Watts audio archives [CD]. Louisville, CO: Sounds True.
Resources for Further Exploration
If you would like to explore these topics further, the following organizations offer thoughtful, research-informed perspectives on near-death experiences, spiritual emergence, and the integration of transformative experiences:
• International Association for Near-Death Studies
A leading organization dedicated to the study of near-death experiences, offering research, education, and personal accounts.
• University of Virginia Division of Perceptual Studies
A research group studying consciousness, past life memories, near-death experiences, and related phenomena from a scientific perspective.
• American Center for the Integration of Spiritually Transformative Experiences
Provides resources and professional support for individuals integrating spiritually transformative experiences.
• Spiritual Competency Academy
Offers clinically grounded training and resources on spirituality in mental health, including spiritual emergence and differentiation from psychopathology.